Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Rectification of mistake - Refusal to exercise the jurisdiction under Section 31 of the U.P. V.A.T. Act, 2008 - Section 31 of the U.P. V.A.T. Act, 2008, does not impose any restrictions on the Tribunal's power to rectify mistakes, and it empowers various entities to rectify mistakes apparent on the face of the record. - The High Court finds that the Tribunal erred in law by rejecting the application solely based on the absence of an ex-parte order, as no such restriction exists in Section 31 of the Act.
Rectification of mistake - Refusal to exercise the jurisdiction under Section 31 of the U.P. V.A.T. Act, 2008 - Section 31 of the U.P. V.A.T. Act, 2008, does not impose any restrictions on the Tribunal's power to rectify mistakes, and it empowers various entities to rectify mistakes apparent on the face of the record. - The High Court finds that the Tribunal erred in law by rejecting the application solely based on the absence of an ex-parte order, as no such restriction exists in Section 31 of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
