Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Offence u/s 276CC - petitioner prime facie found that the non-filing of the return was wilfull - Economic Offences - The petitioner's argument that the tax liability was covered by Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) was refuted, as the TDS amount was insufficient. - The High court emphasized the statutory presumption u/s 278E, shifting the burden onto the petitioner to prove absence of wilfulness. - High court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and directed the lower court to proceed with the proceedings, with a timeline for completion.
Offence u/s 276CC - petitioner prime facie found that the non-filing of the return was wilfull - Economic Offences - The petitioner's argument that the tax liability was covered by Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) was refuted, as the TDS amount was insufficient. - The High court emphasized the statutory presumption u/s 278E, shifting the burden onto the petitioner to prove absence of wilfulness. - High court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and directed the lower court to proceed with the proceedings, with a timeline for completion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
