Limitation in customs appeals permits exclusion for bona fide refund proceedings, enabling restoration of Bill of Entry assessment challenges on merit...
Warehousing permission requires deposit at the designated bonded warehouse; unauthorised diversion triggers confiscation, redemption fine and importer...
Offence u/s 276CC - petitioner prime facie found that the non-filing of the return was wilfull - Economic Offences - The petitioner's argument that the tax liability was covered by Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) was refuted, as the TDS amount was insufficient. - The High court emphasized the statutory presumption u/s 278E, shifting the burden onto the petitioner to prove absence of wilfulness. - High court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and directed the lower court to proceed with the proceedings, with a timeline for completion.
Offence u/s 276CC - petitioner prime facie found that the non-filing of the return was wilfull - Economic Offences - The petitioner's argument that the tax liability was covered by Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) was refuted, as the TDS amount was insufficient. - The High court emphasized the statutory presumption u/s 278E, shifting the burden onto the petitioner to prove absence of wilfulness. - High court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and directed the lower court to proceed with the proceedings, with a timeline for completion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
