Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 - Adoption of either of view by AO - allowability under section 36(1)(viia) - The court concludes that the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue. It holds that the AO's decision was based on a possible view, and therefore, the revision proceedings initiated by the PCIT under section 263 are deemed invalid. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 - Adoption of either of view by AO - allowability under section 36(1)(viia) - The court concludes that the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue. It holds that the AO's decision was based on a possible view, and therefore, the revision proceedings initiated by the PCIT under section 263 are deemed invalid. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.