Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 - Adoption of either of view by AO - allowability under section 36(1)(viia) - The court concludes that the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue. It holds that the AO's decision was based on a possible view, and therefore, the revision proceedings initiated by the PCIT under section 263 are deemed invalid. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 - Adoption of either of view by AO - allowability under section 36(1)(viia) - The court concludes that the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue. It holds that the AO's decision was based on a possible view, and therefore, the revision proceedings initiated by the PCIT under section 263 are deemed invalid. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.