Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - assessee company is a shareholder of lender company or not? - The ITAT held that for amounts to be considered as deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e), specific conditions must be met, including the recipient being a shareholder of the lender company. The court found that the appellant companies were not shareholders of M/s. IG3 Infra Limited at the time of receiving the funds, hence the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) could not be applied.
Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - assessee company is a shareholder of lender company or not? - The ITAT held that for amounts to be considered as deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e), specific conditions must be met, including the recipient being a shareholder of the lender company. The court found that the appellant companies were not shareholders of M/s. IG3 Infra Limited at the time of receiving the funds, hence the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) could not be applied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.