Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 28, 2024Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP u/s 9 - time limitation - threshold limit of amount claimed - With respect to 234 invoices, which are payable within 30 days of the invoices, 224 invoices are ex-facie time barred and the remaining 10 invoices do not meet the threshold of Rs.1,00,00,000/-. - The claim of the Operational Creditor that they were having running account and are covered under Article 1 of the Limitation Act cannot be accepted - The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, ruling that the claims of the operational creditor cannot be accepted due to being either time-barred or not meeting the threshold limit.
Initiation of CIRP u/s 9 - time limitation - threshold limit of amount claimed - With respect to 234 invoices, which are payable within 30 days of the invoices, 224 invoices are ex-facie time barred and the remaining 10 invoices do not meet the threshold of Rs.1,00,00,000/-. - The claim of the Operational Creditor that they were having running account and are covered under Article 1 of the Limitation Act cannot be accepted - The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, ruling that the claims of the operational creditor cannot be accepted due to being either time-barred or not meeting the threshold limit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
