Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Dishonour of Cheque - Proviso (b) to Section 138 of the NI Act not complied - notice of demand dated 08.06.2012 demanded Rs. 2 crores from the accused instead of the cheque amount of Rs. 1 crore - The High court concludes that the complaint filed by the respondent is not maintainable due to procedural irregularities, particularly the failure to comply with the requirements of Proviso (b) of Section 138. - Any demand made in excess of the cheque amount, without clear justification, renders the notice defective. - The petition is allowed, and the complaint against the petitioner is quashed, with no order as to costs.
Dishonour of Cheque - Proviso (b) to Section 138 of the NI Act not complied - notice of demand dated 08.06.2012 demanded Rs. 2 crores from the accused instead of the cheque amount of Rs. 1 crore - The High court concludes that the complaint filed by the respondent is not maintainable due to procedural irregularities, particularly the failure to comply with the requirements of Proviso (b) of Section 138. - Any demand made in excess of the cheque amount, without clear justification, renders the notice defective. - The petition is allowed, and the complaint against the petitioner is quashed, with no order as to costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
