Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Dishonour of Cheque - Rule of evidence - acquittal of accused - Proof of liability - service of demand notice - The High court concluded that the complainant had fulfilled its responsibility of proving the authorization, and the trial court's refusal to accept certain evidence was unjustified and hyper-technical. - Consequently, the court set aside the judgment of acquittal and convicted the respondent for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Dishonour of Cheque - Rule of evidence - acquittal of accused - Proof of liability - service of demand notice - The High court concluded that the complainant had fulfilled its responsibility of proving the authorization, and the trial court's refusal to accept certain evidence was unjustified and hyper-technical. - Consequently, the court set aside the judgment of acquittal and convicted the respondent for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
