Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Dishonour of Cheque - Rule of evidence - acquittal of accused - Proof of liability - service of demand notice - The High court concluded that the complainant had fulfilled its responsibility of proving the authorization, and the trial court's refusal to accept certain evidence was unjustified and hyper-technical. - Consequently, the court set aside the judgment of acquittal and convicted the respondent for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Dishonour of Cheque - Rule of evidence - acquittal of accused - Proof of liability - service of demand notice - The High court concluded that the complainant had fulfilled its responsibility of proving the authorization, and the trial court's refusal to accept certain evidence was unjustified and hyper-technical. - Consequently, the court set aside the judgment of acquittal and convicted the respondent for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
