Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Dishonour of Cheque - Rule of evidence - acquittal of accused - Proof of liability - service of demand notice - The High court concluded that the complainant had fulfilled its responsibility of proving the authorization, and the trial court's refusal to accept certain evidence was unjustified and hyper-technical. - Consequently, the court set aside the judgment of acquittal and convicted the respondent for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Dishonour of Cheque - Rule of evidence - acquittal of accused - Proof of liability - service of demand notice - The High court concluded that the complainant had fulfilled its responsibility of proving the authorization, and the trial court's refusal to accept certain evidence was unjustified and hyper-technical. - Consequently, the court set aside the judgment of acquittal and convicted the respondent for the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
