Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 28, 2024Case LawsAT
Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal -The Adjudicating Authority's role is to ensure that the CoC's decision is not arbitrary. Upon review, it found that the CoC had adequately considered the proposal and made a reasoned decision. Therefore, the Adjudicating Authority upheld the rejection of the Appellant's application. - The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the Appellant's application.
Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal -The Adjudicating Authority's role is to ensure that the CoC's decision is not arbitrary. Upon review, it found that the CoC had adequately considered the proposal and made a reasoned decision. Therefore, the Adjudicating Authority upheld the rejection of the Appellant's application. - The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the Appellant's application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
