Fake AI-generated precedents vitiate adjudication, with unverified citations contaminating the decision-making process and undermining the rule of law...
Valuation of the import of car - the CESTAT criticized the adjudicating authority for rejecting the declared value without sufficient reasoning. It emphasized that without evidence of undervaluation, the transaction value should be accepted. The court also disagreed with the use of Australian car values as a basis for revaluation, highlighting the difference in market dynamics.
Valuation of the import of car - the CESTAT criticized the adjudicating authority for rejecting the declared value without sufficient reasoning. It emphasized that without evidence of undervaluation, the transaction value should be accepted. The court also disagreed with the use of Australian car values as a basis for revaluation, highlighting the difference in market dynamics.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.