Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Valuation of the import of car - the CESTAT criticized the adjudicating authority for rejecting the declared value without sufficient reasoning. It emphasized that without evidence of undervaluation, the transaction value should be accepted. The court also disagreed with the use of Australian car values as a basis for revaluation, highlighting the difference in market dynamics.
Valuation of the import of car - the CESTAT criticized the adjudicating authority for rejecting the declared value without sufficient reasoning. It emphasized that without evidence of undervaluation, the transaction value should be accepted. The court also disagreed with the use of Australian car values as a basis for revaluation, highlighting the difference in market dynamics.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.