Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Effect of resignation from Directorship - ROC refused to remove the name of the Petitioner as a Director of Respondent No. 4-company - The High court acknowledged the peculiar circumstances of the case, particularly the non-commencement of business by the company and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. - The court interpreted Section 168(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, to determine the effective date of the petitioner's resignation as director. - Despite the company's failure to fulfill certain compliances, the court found no justifiable reason to prevent the Registrar of Companies from updating its records to reflect the petitioner's resignation.
Effect of resignation from Directorship - ROC refused to remove the name of the Petitioner as a Director of Respondent No. 4-company - The High court acknowledged the peculiar circumstances of the case, particularly the non-commencement of business by the company and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. - The court interpreted Section 168(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, to determine the effective date of the petitioner's resignation as director. - Despite the company's failure to fulfill certain compliances, the court found no justifiable reason to prevent the Registrar of Companies from updating its records to reflect the petitioner's resignation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
