Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 returns, indirect income, and payment of rent for commercial purposes. - The High court quashes the assessment order in part (related to Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11) and remands the matter for re-consideration. A fresh show cause notice is allowed for Discrepancy No. 2.
Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 returns, indirect income, and payment of rent for commercial purposes. - The High court quashes the assessment order in part (related to Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11) and remands the matter for re-consideration. A fresh show cause notice is allowed for Discrepancy No. 2.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.