Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
TDS u/s 195 - payment for time charter higher charges are Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) - The Tribunal held that the payments made by Jaisu Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. for hiring dredgers from a non-resident entity fall under the definition of "Royalty" as per Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. This classification is based on the provision that payments for the use or right to use any industrial, commercial, or scientific equipment are considered royalties. The decision emphasized that the control and physical possession of the equipment (dredgers) by the assessee, to the exclusion of others, and the obligation to maintain the equipment in good working condition, did not constitute a provision of services but were corollary to the hiring of equipment itself. - ITAT concluded that the assessee was under an obligation to deduct tax at source as royalty payments.
TDS u/s 195 - payment for time charter higher charges are Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) - The Tribunal held that the payments made by Jaisu Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd. for hiring dredgers from a non-resident entity fall under the definition of "Royalty" as per Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. This classification is based on the provision that payments for the use or right to use any industrial, commercial, or scientific equipment are considered royalties. The decision emphasized that the control and physical possession of the equipment (dredgers) by the assessee, to the exclusion of others, and the obligation to maintain the equipment in good working condition, did not constitute a provision of services but were corollary to the hiring of equipment itself. - ITAT concluded that the assessee was under an obligation to deduct tax at source as royalty payments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
