Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal observed that for invoking the provision of section 263 of the Act, twin conditions must be satisfied: the order should be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. If the AO adopts one of the plausible views, no prejudice would be caused. - In this case, the redemption of units of Bajaj Alliance and the claim of it as capital gain were made, which is amenable to capital gain tax under section 45 of the Act. - Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, restoring the findings of the AO.
Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal observed that for invoking the provision of section 263 of the Act, twin conditions must be satisfied: the order should be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. If the AO adopts one of the plausible views, no prejudice would be caused. - In this case, the redemption of units of Bajaj Alliance and the claim of it as capital gain were made, which is amenable to capital gain tax under section 45 of the Act. - Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, restoring the findings of the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
