Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal observed that for invoking the provision of section 263 of the Act, twin conditions must be satisfied: the order should be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. If the AO adopts one of the plausible views, no prejudice would be caused. - In this case, the redemption of units of Bajaj Alliance and the claim of it as capital gain were made, which is amenable to capital gain tax under section 45 of the Act. - Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, restoring the findings of the AO.
Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal observed that for invoking the provision of section 263 of the Act, twin conditions must be satisfied: the order should be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. If the AO adopts one of the plausible views, no prejudice would be caused. - In this case, the redemption of units of Bajaj Alliance and the claim of it as capital gain were made, which is amenable to capital gain tax under section 45 of the Act. - Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, restoring the findings of the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
