Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind properly while initiating the penalty proceedings - The Tribunal rules in favor of the appellant, stating that the penalty proceedings were not validly initiated due to the lack of clarity in the penalty charge. - As a result, the penalty is deleted for all assessment years under consideration.
Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind properly while initiating the penalty proceedings - The Tribunal rules in favor of the appellant, stating that the penalty proceedings were not validly initiated due to the lack of clarity in the penalty charge. - As a result, the penalty is deleted for all assessment years under consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
