Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - The tribunal rejected the notion that unexplained deposits prior to withdrawals undermined the explanation provided by the appellant. - Regarding the PCIT's assertion of the AO's mistake in not making the addition, the tribunal stated that an assessment order must be interpreted as is, without assumptions or postulations. If the AO had indeed erred, avenues for correction, such as rectification under Section 154 of the Act, were available but not utilized.
Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - The tribunal rejected the notion that unexplained deposits prior to withdrawals undermined the explanation provided by the appellant. - Regarding the PCIT's assertion of the AO's mistake in not making the addition, the tribunal stated that an assessment order must be interpreted as is, without assumptions or postulations. If the AO had indeed erred, avenues for correction, such as rectification under Section 154 of the Act, were available but not utilized.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.