Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Revision u/s 263 - period of limitation - whether the assessment order for AY 2015-16, issued on 31st March, 2023, was barred by the limitation prescribed in Section 153B? - The Supreme court noted that the impugned order was passed by the High Court without issuing a formal notice to the respondent-Department or calling for a response from them, despite the standing counsel for the Department being present in Court. - Considering this, the court disposed of the special leave petition, reserving liberty for the petitioner to raise contentions regarding jurisdictional error in relation to the limitation period before the appropriate authority.
Revision u/s 263 - period of limitation - whether the assessment order for AY 2015-16, issued on 31st March, 2023, was barred by the limitation prescribed in Section 153B? - The Supreme court noted that the impugned order was passed by the High Court without issuing a formal notice to the respondent-Department or calling for a response from them, despite the standing counsel for the Department being present in Court. - Considering this, the court disposed of the special leave petition, reserving liberty for the petitioner to raise contentions regarding jurisdictional error in relation to the limitation period before the appropriate authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
