Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty proceedings u/s 271FA - late filing of the SFT statement Online by the appellant - appellant opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and paid the due amount - Form No.4 was not submitted electronically - The Tribunal accepted the manual submission of Form No. 4 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, considering technical difficulties faced by the appellant. - The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, providing relief from the penalty imposed under section 271FA of the Income Tax Act.
Penalty proceedings u/s 271FA - late filing of the SFT statement Online by the appellant - appellant opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and paid the due amount - Form No.4 was not submitted electronically - The Tribunal accepted the manual submission of Form No. 4 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, considering technical difficulties faced by the appellant. - The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, providing relief from the penalty imposed under section 271FA of the Income Tax Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
