Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Page of 4793
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 95851 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty proceedings u/s 271FA - late filing of the SFT statement Online by the appellant - appellant opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and paid the due amount - Form No.4 was not submitted electronically - The Tribunal accepted the manual submission of Form No. 4 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, considering technical difficulties faced by the appellant. - The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, providing relief from the penalty imposed under section 271FA of the Income Tax Act.
Penalty proceedings u/s 271FA - late filing of the SFT statement Online by the appellant - appellant opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and paid the due amount - Form No.4 was not submitted electronically - The Tribunal accepted the manual submission of Form No. 4 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, considering technical difficulties faced by the appellant. - The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, providing relief from the penalty imposed under section 271FA of the Income Tax Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.