Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Condonation of delay - delay of 280 days - sufficient cause - The Tribunal noted that the delay was due to the callous and lackadaisical approach of the appellant in not preferring the appeal within the stipulated time period. - Referring to legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of a bona fide explanation for condonation of delay and strict adherence to the law of limitation. - Despite the liberal construction of the term "sufficient cause," the Tribunal found no plausible explanation from the appellant justifying the substantial delay in filing the appeal.
Condonation of delay - delay of 280 days - sufficient cause - The Tribunal noted that the delay was due to the callous and lackadaisical approach of the appellant in not preferring the appeal within the stipulated time period. - Referring to legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of a bona fide explanation for condonation of delay and strict adherence to the law of limitation. - Despite the liberal construction of the term "sufficient cause," the Tribunal found no plausible explanation from the appellant justifying the substantial delay in filing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
