Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Condonation of delay - delay of 280 days - sufficient cause - The Tribunal noted that the delay was due to the callous and lackadaisical approach of the appellant in not preferring the appeal within the stipulated time period. - Referring to legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of a bona fide explanation for condonation of delay and strict adherence to the law of limitation. - Despite the liberal construction of the term "sufficient cause," the Tribunal found no plausible explanation from the appellant justifying the substantial delay in filing the appeal.
Condonation of delay - delay of 280 days - sufficient cause - The Tribunal noted that the delay was due to the callous and lackadaisical approach of the appellant in not preferring the appeal within the stipulated time period. - Referring to legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of a bona fide explanation for condonation of delay and strict adherence to the law of limitation. - Despite the liberal construction of the term "sufficient cause," the Tribunal found no plausible explanation from the appellant justifying the substantial delay in filing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
