Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Condonation of delay beyond condonable period - appeal rejected on the sole ground that the appeal filed by the appellant is beyond the condonable period i.e., 56 days - The High Court held that while the delay was beyond the condonable period, the absence of the GST Appellate Tribunal justified the court's intervention. It referred to a similar case in Narayanapet Municipality Vs Superintendent of Central Tax, where the appeal was remanded back for reconsideration due to delay beyond the condonable period. The court found the principle applicable to the present case as well.
Condonation of delay beyond condonable period - appeal rejected on the sole ground that the appeal filed by the appellant is beyond the condonable period i.e., 56 days - The High Court held that while the delay was beyond the condonable period, the absence of the GST Appellate Tribunal justified the court's intervention. It referred to a similar case in Narayanapet Municipality Vs Superintendent of Central Tax, where the appeal was remanded back for reconsideration due to delay beyond the condonable period. The court found the principle applicable to the present case as well.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.