Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Condonation of delay beyond condonable period - appeal rejected on the sole ground that the appeal filed by the appellant is beyond the condonable period i.e., 56 days - The High Court held that while the delay was beyond the condonable period, the absence of the GST Appellate Tribunal justified the court's intervention. It referred to a similar case in Narayanapet Municipality Vs Superintendent of Central Tax, where the appeal was remanded back for reconsideration due to delay beyond the condonable period. The court found the principle applicable to the present case as well.
Condonation of delay beyond condonable period - appeal rejected on the sole ground that the appeal filed by the appellant is beyond the condonable period i.e., 56 days - The High Court held that while the delay was beyond the condonable period, the absence of the GST Appellate Tribunal justified the court's intervention. It referred to a similar case in Narayanapet Municipality Vs Superintendent of Central Tax, where the appeal was remanded back for reconsideration due to delay beyond the condonable period. The court found the principle applicable to the present case as well.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
