Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent, Central Goods and Service Tax & Central Excise to matters not exceeding Rs. 10,00,000/-. However, the amount involved in the present case exceeded Rs. 16,00,000/-. - Consequently, the court found the impugned order to be without jurisdiction and set it aside, granting liberty to the respondents to proceed afresh in accordance with the law.
Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent, Central Goods and Service Tax & Central Excise to matters not exceeding Rs. 10,00,000/-. However, the amount involved in the present case exceeded Rs. 16,00,000/-. - Consequently, the court found the impugned order to be without jurisdiction and set it aside, granting liberty to the respondents to proceed afresh in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
