Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Condonation of delay in filing appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) - Dismissal of appeal on the ground that the appeal was delayed by thirty three days - exclusion of the period during which the matter was pending before the High Court. - The Supreme court found merit in the appellant's argument and held that the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned under the proviso to sub-section 3A of Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was restored to the file of the Commissioner (Appeals)
Condonation of delay in filing appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) - Dismissal of appeal on the ground that the appeal was delayed by thirty three days - exclusion of the period during which the matter was pending before the High Court. - The Supreme court found merit in the appellant's argument and held that the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned under the proviso to sub-section 3A of Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was restored to the file of the Commissioner (Appeals)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
