Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Access to Technology in Courts - Hearings through hybrid mode or video conferencing - Lack of Uniformity - Infrastructure and Connectivity - The Supreme Court held that, the use of technology by the Bar and the Bench is no longer an option but a necessity. Members of the Bench, the Bar and the litigants must aid each other to create a technologically adept and friendly environment. - The court issued a series of directions aimed at addressing the identified issues and ensuring the effective implementation of technology in court proceedings.
Access to Technology in Courts - Hearings through hybrid mode or video conferencing - Lack of Uniformity - Infrastructure and Connectivity - The Supreme Court held that, the use of technology by the Bar and the Bench is no longer an option but a necessity. Members of the Bench, the Bar and the litigants must aid each other to create a technologically adept and friendly environment. - The court issued a series of directions aimed at addressing the identified issues and ensuring the effective implementation of technology in court proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.