Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Recovery proceedings - Attachment of assets of the 4th respondent - alienation/transfer as contrary to section 281 of IT Act - claim of ownership of the property - void sale agreement - The High Court hedl that, Tax Recovery officer is not required to declare the sale between the petitioner and the fourth respondent as invalid as the sale is void abinito. The petitioner has to institute a suit in a civil court to establish the right which he claims over the property in dispute. - Therefore, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed.
Recovery proceedings - Attachment of assets of the 4th respondent - alienation/transfer as contrary to section 281 of IT Act - claim of ownership of the property - void sale agreement - The High Court hedl that, Tax Recovery officer is not required to declare the sale between the petitioner and the fourth respondent as invalid as the sale is void abinito. The petitioner has to institute a suit in a civil court to establish the right which he claims over the property in dispute. - Therefore, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.