Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Penalty u/sec. 271(1)(c) - income disclosed in search action - Ex-parte order - The Tribunal observed that the assessee admitted to suppressed receipts, which were disclosed only after a search action and subsequent to the statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act. - The disclosure of suppressed receipts in the return filed under Section 153A of the Act did not absolve the assessee from penalty, as per legal precedent.
Penalty u/sec. 271(1)(c) - income disclosed in search action - Ex-parte order - The Tribunal observed that the assessee admitted to suppressed receipts, which were disclosed only after a search action and subsequent to the statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act. - The disclosure of suppressed receipts in the return filed under Section 153A of the Act did not absolve the assessee from penalty, as per legal precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
