Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/sec. 271(1)(c) - income disclosed in search action - Ex-parte order - The Tribunal observed that the assessee admitted to suppressed receipts, which were disclosed only after a search action and subsequent to the statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act. - The disclosure of suppressed receipts in the return filed under Section 153A of the Act did not absolve the assessee from penalty, as per legal precedent.
Penalty u/sec. 271(1)(c) - income disclosed in search action - Ex-parte order - The Tribunal observed that the assessee admitted to suppressed receipts, which were disclosed only after a search action and subsequent to the statement recorded under Section 132(4) of the Act. - The disclosure of suppressed receipts in the return filed under Section 153A of the Act did not absolve the assessee from penalty, as per legal precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
