Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were not validly initiated due to the lack of satisfaction recorded in the assessment order regarding the violation of provisions of Sec.269SS. - It determined that the delay in moving the proposal for penalty proceedings after the conclusion of assessment proceedings was in violation of the CBDT Circular.
Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were not validly initiated due to the lack of satisfaction recorded in the assessment order regarding the violation of provisions of Sec.269SS. - It determined that the delay in moving the proposal for penalty proceedings after the conclusion of assessment proceedings was in violation of the CBDT Circular.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
