Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were not validly initiated due to the lack of satisfaction recorded in the assessment order regarding the violation of provisions of Sec.269SS. - It determined that the delay in moving the proposal for penalty proceedings after the conclusion of assessment proceedings was in violation of the CBDT Circular.
Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were not validly initiated due to the lack of satisfaction recorded in the assessment order regarding the violation of provisions of Sec.269SS. - It determined that the delay in moving the proposal for penalty proceedings after the conclusion of assessment proceedings was in violation of the CBDT Circular.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
