Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Prayer for a direction extending the validity period of Duty Credit Certificate by a period of 15 years - permit use of the Duty Credit Certificate to defray I.G.S.T and G.S.T Compensation Cess - The High Court held that, the notifications and handbook provisions were within the legal authority and did not violate the petitioner's constitutional rights. - The court acknowledged the petitioner's entitlement under the TPS but noted the procedural and legal complexities that affected the utilization of duty credits. It highlighted that the entitlements were subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in the relevant notifications and handbook provisions. - Thus, the Court cannot come to the aid of the petitioner by granting the relief of extending time by 15 years as the same is not based on any concomitant right.
Prayer for a direction extending the validity period of Duty Credit Certificate by a period of 15 years - permit use of the Duty Credit Certificate to defray I.G.S.T and G.S.T Compensation Cess - The High Court held that, the notifications and handbook provisions were within the legal authority and did not violate the petitioner's constitutional rights. - The court acknowledged the petitioner's entitlement under the TPS but noted the procedural and legal complexities that affected the utilization of duty credits. It highlighted that the entitlements were subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in the relevant notifications and handbook provisions. - Thus, the Court cannot come to the aid of the petitioner by granting the relief of extending time by 15 years as the same is not based on any concomitant right.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.