Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Whether the confessional statement of the appellant given to the Customs officers u/s 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 though retracted at a later stage, is admissible in evidence and could form basis for conviction? - The High Court held that, the admission that the appellant is a licensed dealer in red sander and he know the exporter John Alexander as Alex of Tutucorin is neither a fact to corroborate the incriminating statement of co-noticee, indicting the appellant. The principle of preponderance of probability been wrongly invoked by CESTAT without any fact either circumstantial or by way of corroboration relate the appellant to the Cargo seized by D.R.I. Not even a remote material available to believe the statement of a tainted person. - If statement of an accomplice accepted without material corroboration, it will be travesty of justice.
Whether the confessional statement of the appellant given to the Customs officers u/s 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 though retracted at a later stage, is admissible in evidence and could form basis for conviction? - The High Court held that, the admission that the appellant is a licensed dealer in red sander and he know the exporter John Alexander as Alex of Tutucorin is neither a fact to corroborate the incriminating statement of co-noticee, indicting the appellant. The principle of preponderance of probability been wrongly invoked by CESTAT without any fact either circumstantial or by way of corroboration relate the appellant to the Cargo seized by D.R.I. Not even a remote material available to believe the statement of a tainted person. - If statement of an accomplice accepted without material corroboration, it will be travesty of justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
