Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 23, 2024Case LawsAT
Challenge to direction that entire cost be paid by the Applicant/Appellant - Admission of CIRP set aside - Corporate Debtor was NBFC - NCLAT observed that, in a situation where CIRP has been admitted and there is interim order passed by the Appellate Authority to the effect that in the CIRP no final decision shall be taken with regard to resolution plan since the order was challenged on the ground that CIRP cannot proceed against a NBFC, the CoC and the Resolution professional should have been more cautious in proceeding and incurring costs in the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor. - Resolution Professional allowed to appraoch to the Adjudicating Authority to determine the payment of the remaining costs and whether they should be borne by the Appellant or shared among the CoC members and/or Resolution Professional.
Challenge to direction that entire cost be paid by the Applicant/Appellant - Admission of CIRP set aside - Corporate Debtor was NBFC - NCLAT observed that, in a situation where CIRP has been admitted and there is interim order passed by the Appellate Authority to the effect that in the CIRP no final decision shall be taken with regard to resolution plan since the order was challenged on the ground that CIRP cannot proceed against a NBFC, the CoC and the Resolution professional should have been more cautious in proceeding and incurring costs in the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor. - Resolution Professional allowed to appraoch to the Adjudicating Authority to determine the payment of the remaining costs and whether they should be borne by the Appellant or shared among the CoC members and/or Resolution Professional.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
