Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
LTCG - Denial of exemption u/s 54 - the ITAT observed that, for the purpose of claiming the benefit u/s 54 of the Act, within a period of one year before or two year after the date of transfer of old house, the tax payer should acquire another residential house or should construct a residential house within a specified period of three years from the date of transfer of old house. - The Tribunal held that t assessee has not fulfilled either of the conditions mentioned in Section 54, there is no error or infirmity in the orders of the Lower Authorities in denying the benefit of deduction to the assessee u/s 54.
LTCG - Denial of exemption u/s 54 - the ITAT observed that, for the purpose of claiming the benefit u/s 54 of the Act, within a period of one year before or two year after the date of transfer of old house, the tax payer should acquire another residential house or should construct a residential house within a specified period of three years from the date of transfer of old house. - The Tribunal held that t assessee has not fulfilled either of the conditions mentioned in Section 54, there is no error or infirmity in the orders of the Lower Authorities in denying the benefit of deduction to the assessee u/s 54.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.