Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Challenged the show cause notice issued - mergers and de-mergers - The petitioner argues that the show cause notice was issued in the name of a company, M/s.Fabritex Exports Pvt Ltd, which has ceased to exist due to mergers and de-mergers. - The High Court held that, the benefit of advance license was availed by the Noticee (transferor) and it had filed to discharge its obligation under the advance license, the liability has to be discharged by the transferee company as its successor. As a transferee company, the petitioner cannot state that the liability of the noticee company stood extinguished on account of its merger /amalgamation with it. - Consequently, the HC dismissed the writ petition.
Challenged the show cause notice issued - mergers and de-mergers - The petitioner argues that the show cause notice was issued in the name of a company, M/s.Fabritex Exports Pvt Ltd, which has ceased to exist due to mergers and de-mergers. - The High Court held that, the benefit of advance license was availed by the Noticee (transferor) and it had filed to discharge its obligation under the advance license, the liability has to be discharged by the transferee company as its successor. As a transferee company, the petitioner cannot state that the liability of the noticee company stood extinguished on account of its merger /amalgamation with it. - Consequently, the HC dismissed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
