Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 22, 2024Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP u/s 7 - classification of Commission on sales - Financial Debt or not - threshold limit - The Adjudicating Authority analyzed the definition of 'financial debt' under Section 5(8) of the IBC and concluded that the commission on sale amount did not qualify as financial debt as it did not meet the criteria of disbursal against the consideration for the time value of money. - The NCLAT held that the Appellant having failed to meet the threshold limit in the earlier Section 7 application has now tried to overcome this impediment by inflating the claim amount by resorting to a calculation methodology which lacks rational basis.
Initiation of CIRP u/s 7 - classification of Commission on sales - Financial Debt or not - threshold limit - The Adjudicating Authority analyzed the definition of 'financial debt' under Section 5(8) of the IBC and concluded that the commission on sale amount did not qualify as financial debt as it did not meet the criteria of disbursal against the consideration for the time value of money. - The NCLAT held that the Appellant having failed to meet the threshold limit in the earlier Section 7 application has now tried to overcome this impediment by inflating the claim amount by resorting to a calculation methodology which lacks rational basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.