Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Method of Valuation - section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 or section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944 - packages of cake mixes manufactured having been affixed with retail sale price (RSP) - The tribunal held that, for the period before the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011, goods not intended for retail sale (as indicated by the appellant) did not qualify for section 4A assessment based on RSP. - The tribunal upheld the demand for differential duty for the period prior to 1st April 2011, siding with the respondent on the assessment method. For the period after 1st April 2011, it set aside the demand, recognizing the expanded scope of section 4A.
Method of Valuation - section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 or section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944 - packages of cake mixes manufactured having been affixed with retail sale price (RSP) - The tribunal held that, for the period before the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011, goods not intended for retail sale (as indicated by the appellant) did not qualify for section 4A assessment based on RSP. - The tribunal upheld the demand for differential duty for the period prior to 1st April 2011, siding with the respondent on the assessment method. For the period after 1st April 2011, it set aside the demand, recognizing the expanded scope of section 4A.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
