Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dishonour of Cheque - applicability of principles of discharge - allegations of taking the amount on the pretext of Chinese technology - Forged documents and cheating - The High Court held that while the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not made out, a prima facie case under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code existed. Consequently, the petition was allowed in part, with the petitioner discharged from liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act but facing further proceedings under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
Dishonour of Cheque - applicability of principles of discharge - allegations of taking the amount on the pretext of Chinese technology - Forged documents and cheating - The High Court held that while the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not made out, a prima facie case under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code existed. Consequently, the petition was allowed in part, with the petitioner discharged from liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act but facing further proceedings under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
