Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner with retrospective effect - vague SCN and impugned order - The court noted that the petitioner's response to the show cause notice was belated but highlighted the lack of details and reasoning in both the notice and the impugned order. Emphasized that GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically, and such cancellation must be based on objective criteria, not merely due to late filing of returns. - The GST registration of the petitioner is restored. Petitioner shall comply with Rule 23 and its provisos of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner with retrospective effect - vague SCN and impugned order - The court noted that the petitioner's response to the show cause notice was belated but highlighted the lack of details and reasoning in both the notice and the impugned order. Emphasized that GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically, and such cancellation must be based on objective criteria, not merely due to late filing of returns. - The GST registration of the petitioner is restored. Petitioner shall comply with Rule 23 and its provisos of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.