Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Under declaration of output tax - excess claim of Input Tax Credit - impugned order is a cryptic order without adverting to any of the submissions raised by the petitioner - The High Court set aside the impugned order and show cause notice due to procedural flaws. - The matter was remitted to the GST Officer for re-adjudication after providing the petitioner with an opportunity for a personal hearing.
Under declaration of output tax - excess claim of Input Tax Credit - impugned order is a cryptic order without adverting to any of the submissions raised by the petitioner - The High Court set aside the impugned order and show cause notice due to procedural flaws. - The matter was remitted to the GST Officer for re-adjudication after providing the petitioner with an opportunity for a personal hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.