Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Entitlement for relief u/s 89(1) - Can be equated to refund amount or not - Employee under suspension from 01.03.1996 to 16.04.2007 got ‘subsistence allowance’ for the said period. - The court clarified that the relief u/s 89 of the Income Tax Act is a form of rebate or adjustment in the computation of tax liability, not a direct refundable amount. It highlighted that the relief aims to adjust the tax liability when income is received in arrears or advance, impacting the tax rate applied. - The court found no error in the Income Tax Department's calculation of the refund amount. It noted that after accounting for the relief u/s 89, the correct refundable amount was determined and paid to the petitioner.
Entitlement for relief u/s 89(1) - Can be equated to refund amount or not - Employee under suspension from 01.03.1996 to 16.04.2007 got ‘subsistence allowance’ for the said period. - The court clarified that the relief u/s 89 of the Income Tax Act is a form of rebate or adjustment in the computation of tax liability, not a direct refundable amount. It highlighted that the relief aims to adjust the tax liability when income is received in arrears or advance, impacting the tax rate applied. - The court found no error in the Income Tax Department's calculation of the refund amount. It noted that after accounting for the relief u/s 89, the correct refundable amount was determined and paid to the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
