ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Rejection of Revision application u/s 264 - Exemption u/s 11 denied to assessee - benefits denied merely on the ground that the donor has deducted TDS u/s 194C and 194J while allocating requisite grants to the assessee - scope of principle of consistency in taxation matters - The High Court held that, the deduction of TDS under specific sections was deemed an insufficient basis to deny exemptions under Sections 11 and 12. The court underscored that such deductions, possibly made under a misconception by the donors, should not adversely affect the Foundation's eligibility for exemptions. - Benefit of exemption allowed.
Rejection of Revision application u/s 264 - Exemption u/s 11 denied to assessee - benefits denied merely on the ground that the donor has deducted TDS u/s 194C and 194J while allocating requisite grants to the assessee - scope of principle of consistency in taxation matters - The High Court held that, the deduction of TDS under specific sections was deemed an insufficient basis to deny exemptions under Sections 11 and 12. The court underscored that such deductions, possibly made under a misconception by the donors, should not adversely affect the Foundation's eligibility for exemptions. - Benefit of exemption allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.