Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction. - The ITAT held that, in view of such facts the observations of Ld. AO cannot be rejected at threshold, in absence of submission of requisite documents pertaining to the alleged creditor by the assessee having primary onus to satisfy the Ld. AO according to the provisions of section 68, who is supporting its contentions only by producing certain internal documents and bank statements. - Therefore, the addition made by the AO under section 68 was upheld.
Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction. - The ITAT held that, in view of such facts the observations of Ld. AO cannot be rejected at threshold, in absence of submission of requisite documents pertaining to the alleged creditor by the assessee having primary onus to satisfy the Ld. AO according to the provisions of section 68, who is supporting its contentions only by producing certain internal documents and bank statements. - Therefore, the addition made by the AO under section 68 was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
