Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 21, 2024Case LawsAT
Withdrawal of application which was admitted earlier for CIRP - Manner of computation of voting with regard to application u/s 12A - The NCLAT clarified that for a proposal under Section 12A to be approved, it must receive the support of 90% of the CoC's voting share. It rejected the Adjudicating Authority's interpretation that a majority vote within the homebuyers' class could be extrapolated to mean 100% support from that class for the purpose of Section 12A approval. - The NCLAT held that, since the proposal u/s 12A having not been approved by 90% vote share of the CoC, the order dated 24.05.2023 has to be set aside reviving the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor.
Withdrawal of application which was admitted earlier for CIRP - Manner of computation of voting with regard to application u/s 12A - The NCLAT clarified that for a proposal under Section 12A to be approved, it must receive the support of 90% of the CoC's voting share. It rejected the Adjudicating Authority's interpretation that a majority vote within the homebuyers' class could be extrapolated to mean 100% support from that class for the purpose of Section 12A approval. - The NCLAT held that, since the proposal u/s 12A having not been approved by 90% vote share of the CoC, the order dated 24.05.2023 has to be set aside reviving the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.